Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 03:26

Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
CPI Report Today: Dow Futures Slip; U.S. and China Agree Trade Truce Framework - WSJ
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Social Security's 2026 COLA Has an Unpleasant Surprise in Store for Retirees - The Motley Fool
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Nothing Phone (3) now rumoured to cost more than expected in some markets - Notebookcheck
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Dave Chappelle and Mo Amer on Politics and Comedy, SNL Monologues - Variety
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sleep’s Secret Sequence May Sculpt Our Memories Like a Garden - Neuroscience News
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Hey girls can we see some anal play?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
What is your review of UST Global?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.